,jpeg/013/443/991/v2/320x180.201.jpg)
,jpeg/019/539/908/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/003/752/084/v2/320x180.249.jpg)
,jpeg/009/899/885/v2/320x180.258.jpg)
,jpeg/007/667/363/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/000/775/349/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/020/882/907/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/019/895/933/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/003/263/525/v2/320x180.212.jpg)
,jpeg/010/003/368/v2/320x180.215.jpg)
,jpeg/007/195/125/1280x720.6.jpg)
코멘트
10
It shouldn't be. A kilt is a garment that can be worn anytime. Formal; semi-formal; smart-casual; even in the garden. The big advantage is that you only have to change the garments you wear on the upper part of your body and maybe a change of sporran (seal-skin is a bit OTT for casual wear). I have five kilts in different tartans. Oh, and the real advantage is that women can't resist exploring what I (don't) wear underneath. 
